Himachal Pradesh High Court

CWP/18077/2026 on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

CWP No.18075 of 2026 along with

connected matters.

Decided on : 15

th October

, 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CWP No. 18075 of 2026. Kapil Dev ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

2. CWP No. 18077 of 2026. Reeta Devi ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

3. CWP No. 18079 of 2026. Narender Kumar ...Petitioner.

Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents.

Coram:

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate and Mr. Aman Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Assistant Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations (Annexed with the respective petitions), seeking applicability of Inder Singh Thakur & Ors Vs. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:57:55 :::CIS

2 State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Assistant Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 15th October, 2026.

(jai)

2CWP No. 4830 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matter on 07.04.2025. High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 16:57:55 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead