Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1677/2026 on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:45709
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1677 of 2026
Date of decision: 15.10.2026. Hem Raj & another
...Petitioners.
Versus
Ashish Kumar Kohli
...Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Raham Tullah, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional, Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioners have invoked the contempt jurisdiction of this Court, alleging non-compliance of the order/judgment dated 18.05.2026 [Annexure C-1], in CWP No. 6833 of 2026, titled as Hem Raj & another versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, whereby a Coordinate Bench of this Court, passed the following orders:- “2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representations (Annexure P-3 (colly)) of the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law.”
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:03:22 :::CIS
2. Learned Counsel for petitioners submits that Respondents have neither decided the representation nor any speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner, as yet.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.
5. As prayed by Learned Counsel for petitioner and considering the matter in above perspective, this Court disposes of the instant petition, with direction to Respondents/Competent Authority to decide the representation [Annexure P-3 in said Writ Petition] within a period of six weeks from today.
6. Needless to say, that in case, the representation has already been decided, the decision on the representation/speaking order be conveyed to the petitioners within the aforesaid period.
7. In aforesaid terms, the instant proceedings are closed and notice is discharged.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 15th October, 2026. (kck) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:03:22 :::CIS