Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./1544/2026 on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:45820
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1544
of 2026
Decided on: 15
th October, 2026
_______________________________________________________ Renu Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others
...Respondents ________________________________________________________
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
CMP No.18620 of 2026
By way of present application, a prayer has been made to condone the delay in refiling the petition. In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and accordingly disposed of.
Execution Petition No.1544
of 2026
Learned Deputy Advocate General has produced a copy of office order dated 14.10.2026, passed by the Deputy Director of School Education (Elementary), Kangra at Dharamshala, which is taken on record.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:05:01 :::CIS
2. A perusal of the same reveals that the services of the petitioner have been regularized and the Principal of the concerned School has been directed to grant the consequential benefits regarding monetary benefits.
3. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 08.12.2025, passed in CWP No.18535 of 2025, titled, Renu Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others has duly been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is closed. However, in case, the arrears are not released in favour of the petitioner, strictly as per the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed within eight weeks from today, she shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition.
4. The execution petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
th October, 2026
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:05:01 :::CIS