Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2493/2026 on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:45713
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2493 of 2026
Date of decision: 15.10.2026. Gagandeep Sharma & others
...Petitioners.
Versus
State of H.P & others.
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioners have come up before this Court, seeking execution and implementation of the order/judgment dated 18.05.2026 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 6922 of 2026, titled as Gagandeep Sharma & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:- “2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that let representations (Annexure P-3 (colly)) of the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments contained therein, by passing a speaking order, within 12 weeks’ from today, in accordance with law”.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:05:19 :::CIS
2. Heard.
3. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of respondents.
4. At this stage, Learned Counsel for the petitioners, on Instructions, states that petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, the Respondents are directed to implement the order/judgment in a time bound manner. [Statement Taken On Record].
5. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also.
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents- Competent Authority to implement the order/judgment within a period of six weeks from today.
7. In case, any grievance still remains, the petitioners may seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter, in accordance with law.
8. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition stands disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 15, 2026. (kck) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:05:19 :::CIS