Himachal Pradesh High Court
CR.R/230/2026 on 15 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 230 of 2026 Date of Decision: 15.10.2026. Pankaj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus M/s Ambey H.P. Center Bangana ...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Saroj, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) It has been stated on behalf of the respondent/complainant that the matter has been reconciled between the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the receipt dated 15.10.2026, issued by Member Secretary, H.P. Legal Services Authority, Kasumpti, Shimla, regarding the deposit of ₹24,000/- being the 7.5% of the cheque amount of ₹2,50,000/-, which is taken on record.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent/complainant, under instructions, submits that the matter has been reconciled between the parties and he has instructions not to press the complaint.
4. In view of this statement, the present revision is allowed and the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Una, District Una, H.P. in Criminal Appeal No. 46 of 2025, titled Pankaj Kumar Vs. M/s Ambey H.P. Center Bangana affirming the judgment of conviction dated 27.3.2025 and order of sentence dated 4.4.2025, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una, District Una, H.P., in Case No. 193-II-2019, titled M/s Ambey HP Center Bangana Vs. Pankaj Kumar are ordered to be set aside and the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.
5. It has been submitted that ₹3,20,000/- have been deposited in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una, District Una, H.P. which has to be disbursed to respondent/complainant in terms of the compromise. Let the amount of ₹3,20,000/-, deposited in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Una, District Una, H.P. are ordered to be disbursed to respondent/complainant along with up to date interest by remitting the same to his bank account on furnishing of the bank account details, if not furnished earlier.
6. In view of the above, the present revision is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 15th October, 2026 (Chander)