Madras High Court

WP(MD)/29983/2026 of Nagoormydeen Vs The District Revenue Officer on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011484372026}

and

W.M.P.(MD)No.22866 of 2026

Nagoormydeen

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Revenue Officer

Tirunelveli

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Cheranmahadevi Taluk

Tirunelveli

3. The Tahsildar

Cheranmahadevi Taluk

Tirunelveli

..Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records from the office of the respondent with respect to File No. 2023/0105/29/250131 dated 05.08.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to sub-divide the land of the petitioner to an extent of 1.06 acres situated in S.NOS.424/1A

and 424/lB, comprised in Joint Patta No.1082 and 545, South Veeravanallur Village - II, Cheranmahadevi Taluk, Tirunelvelli District

WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026

and issue separate Patta in the name of the petitioner on the basis of petitioner's sale deed dated 13.08.2021.

For Petitioner:

Mr. S. Packiya Muthu

For Respondents: Mr.S.Siva Thilakar

Special Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents.

2. Under the impugned proceedings, the petitioner's request for the grant of patta had been rejected without assigning any reasons whatsoever. Even though the order refers to a report of the Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, it does not contain the contents of the report or the reasons for rejection.

3. In view of the above, the impugned order stands set aside, and the matter is remanded to the 3rd respondent to consider the case of the petitioner and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be carried out by the 3rd respondent within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026

4. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Nsr To:

1. The District Revenue Officer Tirunelveli

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Cheranmahadevi Taluk Tirunelveli

3. The Tahsildar Cheranmahadevi Taluk Tirunelveli

WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. Nsr WP(MD) No. 29983 of 2026 16-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead