Madras High Court

WP(MD)/30154/2026 of M.Amutha Vs The District Revenue Officer on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 16-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026

and

WMP (MD) Nos.23011 & 23012 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011490342026}

M.Amutha,

W/o.Muthukoori,

Door No. 2/47

Vengalur

Paramakudi

Ramanathapuram District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Revenue Officer,

Ramanathapuram

Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Mu.Mu.A2/2175/2026 dated 28.09.2026

and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew the petitioners Explosives Licence bearing Licence No. 2/2008 in accordance with the applicable provisions of law and pass such further or other orders as this

WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026

Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of this case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s C.Prithviraj

For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Parthiban, SGP

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

An order rejecting the petitioner's request for renewal of an explosives licence is challenged in this writ petition, primarily on the ground of breach of the principles of natural justice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an opportunity of hearing is mandated under Rule 116(5) of the Explosives Rules, 2008. On account of the contravention thereof, he submits that order is liable to be set aside.

3. Accepting notice for the respondents, Mr.R.Parthiban, learned Special Government Pleader, submits that the matter may be remanded for reconsideration.

4. In view of the breach of the principles of natural justice, the impugned order cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. As a corollary, the matter is remanded for reconsideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued by

WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026 the second respondent within 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 16-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PKN To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer cum Sub Collector Paramakudi Ramanathapuram District.

WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN WP(MD) No. 30154 of 2026 16-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead