Himachal Pradesh High Court
COPC/1638/2026 on 14 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No.1638 of 2026
Date of decision:14.10.2026
Latta Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
Divesh Kumar
...Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Manish Thakur, Deputy Advocate General.
Mr. Devi Ram Chauhan, Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division, Nerchowk, District Mandi, is present in Court.
Romesh Verma, Judge (oral):
The instant petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 15191 of 2026, dated 01.09.2026.
2. This matter was listed on 12.10.2026 and the following order was passed: “In sequel to order dated 09.10.2026, Shri Devi Ram Chauhan, Executive Engineer, is present in Court in person. He submits that the inspection of the site in question shall be conducted tomorrow and thereafter, comprehensive compliance report shall be filed before this Court.
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:14:19 :::CIS
-2-
The compliance report be positively placed on record by 14.10.2026.
List on 14.10.2026.”
3. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the copy of the office order dated 13.10.2026, whereby, after considering the case of the petitioner and after inspecting the site, the same has been ordered to be rejected.
4. Since the judgment as passed by this Court has been complied with, therefore nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings.
5. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that liberty may be granted to him to assail the office order as passed by the respondents on 13.10.2026.
6. Consequently, the present petition is closed with liberty as prayed for along with pending application(s), if any.
(Romesh Verma)
Judge 14th October, 2026.
(vt) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:14:19 :::CIS