Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWPOA/1093/2019 on 13 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:45077 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
AT SHIMLA
CWPOA No.1093 of 2019
Decided on: 13.10.2026 __________________________________________________________
Gaurav Sharma
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of HP and others
....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner had filed instant writ petition i.e. CWP No.9948 of before this Court; and upon establishment of State Administrative Tribunal, the matter was transferred to the said Tribunal; and now upon its abolition, the same has been re-transferred to this Court as CWPOA No.1093 of 2019, seeking the following relief:- “13 (i) That the respondents may be directed to reconsider the case of petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds under dying in harness scheme at the earliest as per his educational qualification.”
2. Regarding the prayer for re-consideration of
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:25:34 :::CIS
2026:HHC:45077
his case for compassionate appointment; and upon issuance of notice by this Court, pleadings were exchanged inter-se the parties to the preset lis, whereby, the claim was denied, on the ground that the income of petitioner exceeds the income criteria prescribed by the Government.
3. Upon listing of matter today, Ms. Vandana Thakur, Learned Counsel, on Instructions of Mr. Sanjay Jaswal, Learned Original Counsel, as received from the petitioner, submits that due to subsequent events, the petitioner does not intend to pursue the instant Petition hereinafter [Statement Taken on Record].
4. Prayer, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also.
5. Considering the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, as above, nothing survives for determination and the present petition is closed.
In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 13, 2026
[Bhardwaj] High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:25:34 :::CIS