Himachal Pradesh High Court

EX.P./2440/2026 on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Execution Petition No.2440 of 2026

Date of Decision: 13.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Rakesh Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.

…....Respondents

Coram

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 27.5.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No. 7321 of 2025, titled as Rakesh Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide representation of the petitioner in light of judgment passed in CWP No. 2004 of 2017, titled as Taj Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, within a period of four weeks.

High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:26:25 :::CIS

2

2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that in terms of undertaking given before the Hon'ble Apex Court, benefits flowing from afore said judgment shall be released to the petitioner within a period of four months.

3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful within four months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. October 13, 2026

(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)

Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:26:25 :::CIS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead