Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2450/2026 on 13 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2450 of 2026 Decided on: 13.10.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Vinay Kumar and another
....Petitioners Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others ....Respondents
Coram :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners : Mr. Yogesh K. Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Candel, Additional Advocate General. ____________________________________________________________ Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioners has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 17.04.2026 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 4620 of 2026, titled as Vinay Kumar and another versus State of Himachal Pradesh whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:-
2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation [Annexure P-6] filed by the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2026:HHC:45085 )
the contents therein.”
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that after passing of the order/judgment [Annexure E-1], the petitioner had submitted a representation on 24.01.2026 [Annexure E-2], requesting the respondent to implement the judgment but nothing has been done till today.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. At this stage, Learned Counsel submits that petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, the Respondent- Competent Authority decides the case of the petitioner in a time bound manner. [Statement taken on record]
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, this Court directs the Respondent/Competent Authority to decide the matter in terms of the order/judgment within six weeks positively.
7. Needless to say, that in case, the decision is not taken in terms of the order, petitioner liberty is reserved to seek appropriate remedy.
( 2026:HHC:45085 )
8. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge
October 13, 2026 (Anita)