Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2469/2026 on 13 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2469 of 2026
Date of decision: 13.10.2026. Yashpal Sharma
...Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education.
...Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent : Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution and implementation of the order/judgment dated 27.12.2024 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 15113 of 2024, titled as Yashpal Sharma versus Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education alongwith connected matters, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:- “2. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, without making any observation on the merits of the cases, these petitions are disposed of with the direction that let the
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:27:16 :::CIS
representations filed by the petitioners, be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein, within a period of eight weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly”.
2. Heard.
3. Notice. Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of the Respondent.
4. Upon listing of the matter, Learned Counsel for the Respondent has placed on record Office Order dated 28.02.2025, whereby the claim of the petitioner was rejected by the Respondent-Board. [Taken On Record].
5. Faced with the aove situation, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, as prayed, is granted liberty to assail the rejection order dated 28.02.2025 (supra) hereinafter in appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law.
6. In aforesaid terms, nothing remains for implementation and the instant proceedings are closed/ disposed of, alongwith all pending applications, if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 13, 2026. (kck) High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:27:16 :::CIS