Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2470/2026 on 13 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADSH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2470 of 2026 Decided on: 13.10.2026 ___________________________________________________________ Jai Kant Gautam
....Petitioner Versus
Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University ....Respondent
Coram :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner : Mr. Anniket Bhaik, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent-University. ____________________________________________________________ Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 26.05.2026 [Annexure E-1], passed in CWP No. 7845 of 2026, titled as Jai Kant Gautam versus Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:-
2. As prayed for, this petition is disposed of with the direction that representation [Annexure P-7] filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of twelve weeks from today in terms of
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
( 2026:HHC:45097 ) the contents therein.”
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that representation [Annexure P-7 in the aforesaid with petition] has not been decided and no speaking order has been conveyed to the petitioner as yet.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Learned Counsel waives service of notice on behalf of the Respondent- University.
5. At this stage, Learned Counsel submits that petitioner shall be satisfied, in case, the Respondent- Competent Authority decides the representation of the petitioner, in a time bound manner. [Statement taken on record]
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, this Court directs the Respondent/Competent Authority to decide the representation, in terms of the order/judgment, within six weeks positively.
7. Needless to say, that in case, the order/judgment is not complied with in terms of this order, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter,
( 2026:HHC:45097 ) in accordance with law.
8. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge
October 13, 2026 (Anita)