Madras High Court

OSA/212/2023 of S. SENTHIL NATHAN Vs M/S. AIR PACK GASES on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OSA No. 212 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GK.MUTHUKUMAAR

OSA No. 212 of 2023

CNR:{HCMA011755672023}

AND

CMP NO. 25060 OF 2023

1. S. Senthil Nathan

S/o. Selvaraj,

Ozone Metrozone Apartment L-Block,

102, First Floor, No.44, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

2. S.Iniya

W/o.Senthil Nathan

Ozone Metrozone Apartment L-Block,

102, First Floor, No.44, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040.

..Appellant(s)

Vs

M/s. Air Pack Gases

(A registered Partnership Firm bearing

Reg.No.115/2015)

Rep by its Managing Partner Mr.B.Murali

Plot No. 338-341, Survey No.173

Vadakkal B Village, Sriperumbudur,

Kancheepuram,

Tamil Nadu - 602105.

..Respondent(s)

OSA No. 212 of 2023

This original side appeal is preferred under XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent seeking to set aside the order dated 14.08.2023 in Appl.No. 2407 of 2023 in C.S.No.81 of 2013 passed by this Hon’ble Court and to allow the appeal and thus render justice.

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:57 pm )

OSA No. 212 of 2023

For Appellant(s):

Mr.T.Mohan, Senior Advocate

for Mr.N.Ganesh

For Respondent(s):

Mr.D.Kannan

for Mrs.Inthu Karunakaran

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.Sathish Kumar J.) Challenge has been made to the order dated 14.08.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the application in A.No.2407 of 2023 in C.S.No.81 of 2013, which has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents therein / appellants herein to deposit the suit amount of Rs.1,25,67,470/- or to furnish security to the tune of suit amount, failing which to attach the schedule property.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by both sides that during the appeal proceedings on 03.11.2023, a status quo order was passed and both the parties were directed to maintain status quo. Now, it is fairly submitted by both learned counsel that the suit is in the fag end and it is now posted for defendants’ side evidence. In such view of the matter, this court is of the view that no prejudice would be caused to the parties if the status quo order is directed to continue till the disposal of the suit. Accordingly, this original side appeal is disposed of with a direction to both parties to maintain status quo till

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:57 pm )

OSA No. 212 of 2023

the disposal of the suit. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (N.S.K.,J.) (G.K.M.,J.) 15-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VVK

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:57 pm )

OSA No. 212 of 2023

N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND GK.MUTHUKUMAAR J. VVK OSA No. 212 of 2023 AND CMP NO. 25060 OF 2023 15-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:57 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead