Madras High Court
OSA(CAD)/114/2026 of M/s Galstar Engineering Private Limited. Vs M/sJecas Infrastructure and Licensing Consultancy on 15 October 2026
OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GK.MUTHUKUMAAR
OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012260432026}
AND
CMP NO. 26695 OF 2026,CMP NO. 26693 OF 2026
M/s Galstar Engineering Private Limited., Rep.by its Director, Dillbabu Ajay Kumar, Plot No.G-61, SIPCOT Industrial Park, Vallam- Vadagal, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District- 602105.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
M/sJecas Infrastructure and Licensing Consultancy Pvt.Ltd., Rep.by its Director, Hung Chun Chung alais Jason, Having office at A-14, Thiru vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032.
..Respondent(s)
This original side appeal is preferred under section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent seeking to set aside the impugned order dated 15.09.2026 passed by the learned Judge in OA.No.873 of 2026 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:53 pm )
OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.Kingston Jerold
For Respondent(s):
Mr.G.Kalyan Jhabakh
for M/s.Surana and Surana
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.Sathish Kumar J.) A challenge has been made to the order passed by the learned single Judge in O.A.No.873 of 2026, granting interim injunction in section 9 application, inter-alia restraining the appellant from interfering with the possession of the respondent herein.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that he has already filed a petition in Arb.O.P. (Commercial Division) No.734 of 2026 under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for the appointment of an arbitrator. This court is of the view that since arbitration proceedings has been invoked, the matter shall be resolved by arbitration. The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that after the inventory has been taken by the advocate commissioner, the construction utensils were also used by the respondent. Since the matter has been referred to the arbitration, the appellant can raise all such disputes as a counter claim in the arbitral proceedings. In such view of the matter, nothing further survives in the appeal. With the aforesaid observation,
( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:53 pm )
OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026
this original side appeal is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (N.S.K.,J.) (G.K.M.,J.) 15-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VVK
( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:53 pm )
OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026
N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND GK.MUTHUKUMAAR J. VVK OSA(CAD) No. 114 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 26695 OF 2026,CMP NO. 26693 OF 2026 15-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 26/10/2026 03:33:53 pm )