Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./313/2025 on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.313 of 2025
Date of Decision: 12.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Kashmir Singh ……...Petitioner Versus HPTDCL
…....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Ms. Suchita Kaintura, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
It is not in dispute that save and except revised pay scale, other admissible dues of the petitioner stand cleared. Learned counsel representing the petitioner states that arrears to the tune of Rs. 2,21,250/-, are not being released on account of pendency of the review petition filed in case of Tulsi Ram, wherein no stay has been granted against the judgment sought to be reviewed. He states that the respondent Corporation is adopting pick and choose method by releasing arrears to some of the employees and denying to others.
2. Since learned counsel representing the respondent Corporation has not been able to dispute that no stay has been granted in the review petition filed in Tulsi Ram's case, this Court deems it fit to dispose of the High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:36:54 :::CIS
2 present petition with a direction to the respondent Corporation to ensure that due and admissible arrears, if any, shall be released to the petitioner within a period of four months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. Ordered accordingly.
October 12, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:36:54 :::CIS