Madras High Court
WP CRL./2787/2026 of R.Vinoth Vs The State Rep. by, The Superintendent of Police on 15 October 2026
WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012477662026}
R.Vinoth
S/o Rangasamy,
No.1/300, Nadarkottai,
Ottamalai, Hogenakkal Post,
Pennagaram Taluk,
Dharmapuri District.
..Petitioner
Vs
1. The State Rep. by, The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Near Collectorate, Dharmapuri.
2. The Inspector of Police
Hogenakkal Police Station,
Dharmapuri.
..Respondent
To issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to carry on the normal and lawful functioning of the business carried to under the name and style of Kurinji Ayurveda Body Massage Central Spa at D.No.1/628A, Pennagaram Taluk, Koothapadi, Hogenakkal Post, Dharmapuri District.
WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026
For Petitioner :
Mr.N.Arun Kumar
For Respondents :
Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar,
Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu
Criminal
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
I heard Mr.N.Arun Kumar for the petitioner and Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is running a spa under the name and style of “Kurinji Ayurvedic Body Massage Center Spa” at Door No.1/628A, Pennagaram Taluk, Koothampadi, Hogenakkal Post, Dharmapuri District. The petitioner has applied to the local body having control over the Koothampadi Village. One of the requirements is to get a “No Objection Certificate” (NOC) from the Police. The petitioner approached the second respondent for necessary permission. As it was not forthcoming, he is before this Court.
3. When the matter was taken up, Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar reports that the second respondent has inspected the premises and has und that it is in compliance with the requirements of the Police.
4. That being the position, necessary recommendation should be forwarded by the second respondent to the first respondent who will, in turn, forward it to the local body.
WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026
5. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. 15-10-2026 nl Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No To
1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Near Collectorate, Dharmapuri.
2. The Inspector of Police Hogenakkal Police Station, Dharmapuri.
WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. nl WP Crl. No. 2787 of 2026 15-10-2026