Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2428/2026 on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:44726
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2428 of 2026
Date of decision: 12.10.2026. Pushpa Rani & others
...Petitioners.
Versus
State of H.P. & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioners have come up before this Court, seeking execution and implementation of the order/judgment dated 15.09.2025 [Annexure E-1] passed in CWP No. 14848 of 2025, titled as Pushpa Rani & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, without examining the merits of the matter, disposed of the writ petition by directing the Respondents- Competent Authority to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners in accordance with law, as
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes well as taking into consideration the judgment passed in Mohit Sharma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others [CWP No. 1638 of 2024], decided on 19.11.2024, within a period of six weeks.
2. Heard.
3. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
4. After hearing Learned Counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the view, that the order/judgment dated 15.09.2025 [Annexure E-1], directing the Respondents to decide the representations stands complied with, as the representations have been decided by a speaking order dated 18.11.2025 [Annexure E-2].
5. Faced with this situation, Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be granted liberty to challenge or to seek appropriate remedy hereinafter, in accordance with law. [Statement taken on Record].
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, instant petition is closed, with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy, qua the speaking order dated
18.11.2025, [Annexure E-2] hereinafter, in accordance with law.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 12, 2026. (kck)