Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2429/2026 on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.2429 of 2026
Date of Decision: 12.10.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Manjeet Kumar and Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Aasheesh Patial, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioners for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 5.1.2026, passed by this Court in CWP No.65 of 2026, titled as Lakhbir Singh and Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to consider and decide representation of the petitioners in light of judgment dated 9.10.2023, passed in CWP No. 1747 of 2023, titled as Dinesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors, within four weeks. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:37:21 :::CIS
2 the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant proceedings.
2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General fairly states that in terms of undertaking given before the Hon'ble Apex Court, benefits flowing from afore said judgment shall be released to the petitioner within a period of three weeks.
2. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful within three weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment.
October 12, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:37:21 :::CIS