Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2438/2026 on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:44743
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2438 of 2026
Date of decision: 12.10.2026. Aptoo Ram
...Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation & another
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution and implementation of the order/judgment dated 11.07.2025 [Annexure E-1] passed in CWP No. 11137 of 2025, titled as Aptoo Ram versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, had passed the following orders:- “In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to pay to the petitioner the amount of pension, Gratuity, Leave Encashment and commutation of pension with actual rate of interest as per applicable rules, till
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes the time of actual payment, which shall be paid to him within a period of six months from today. The due amount of payment, if delayed beyond six months, shall be paid with interest at the rate of 9% per annum till the date of its actual payment.”
2. Heard.
3. Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
4. Upon listing of instant petition, Learned Counsel for Respondent-Corporation states that due and admissible retiral benefits including pension, gratuity, leave encashment and commutation of pension have been released to the petitioner in terms of the order/judgment as aforesaid.
5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above situation and acknowledges the compliance made by the Respondents. [Statement Taken On Rcord].
6. Considering the matter in above perspective, and taking into account the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, instant petition is closed, as the order/judgment, stands complied with by the Respondents.
7. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition stands disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 12, 2026. (kck)