Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.P./2447/2026 on 12 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
2026:HHC:44727
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No. 2447 of 2026
Date of decision: 12.10.2026. Anjna Kumaari
...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. & others
...Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Shivani, Advocate, vice Mr. Ravneet Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge:
Petitioner has come up before this Court, seeking execution/implementation of the order/judgment dated 20.04.2026 [Annexure E-1] passed, in CWP No. 4833 of 2026, titled as Anjna Kumari versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby, a Coordinate Bench of this Court, has passed the following orders:- “3. Without making any observation on the merit of the case, this writ petition is accordingly disposed of with the direction that the representation made by the petitioner,
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, shall be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 12 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law.”
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that after passing of the order/judgment [Annexure E-1], the petitioner had submitted a representation requesting the respondents to implement the judgment but nothing has been done till today.
3. Heard.
4. Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
5. At this stage, Learned Counsel, on Instructions, states that petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, Respondents are directed to implement the order/judgment in a time bound manner. [Statement Taken On Record]
6. Considering the matter in above perspective and in view of the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents-Competent Authority, to implement the order/judgment, within a period of six weeks from today.
7. In case, any grievance still remains, petitioner may seek appropriate remedy, hereinafter, in accordance with law.
8. In aforesaid terms, the instant petition stands disposed of, alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge October 12, 2026. (kck)