Madras High Court

WP(MD)/29564/2026 of Reena Vs The District Collector on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 15-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011451352026}

Reena

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector

Sivagangai District

SivagangaiSivagangai

2. The District Revenue Officer

Sivagangai District,

Sivagangai.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Sivagangai

Sivagangai District.

4. The Tahsildar

Sivagangai Taluk

Sivagangai District.

5. Manjula

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th Respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders for correction of Legal Heir Certificate bearing Certificate No. TN- 7202608282461, by removing the name of the 5th Respondent from the said certificate and by deleting the word ‘Separated’ from the description of the Petitioner, after verifying the relevant marriage documents.

WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s V.Kannan

For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh

Additional Government Pleader

for R1 to R4

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved by the inclusion of the name of the fifth respondent in the Legal Heir Certificate relating to her late husband, Gurusekar.

2. Relying on G.O.(Ms.)No.110, Revenue and Disaster Management, Revenue Administration Wing, U-3(2) Section, dated 13.03.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is specified therein that only the existing spouse’s name should be recorded in the Legal Heir Certificate and not the name of the divorced spouse.

3. Accepting notice for respondents 1 to 4, Mr.P.Pethu Rajesh, learned Additional Government Pleader, submits that an appeal remedy is permitted in G.O.(Ms) No.478, Revenue and Disaster Management, Revenue Administration Wing, RA-3(2) Section, dated 29.09.2022.

4. Considering the above submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of on following terms:

WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026

i. The petitioner is permitted to file an appeal before the jurisdictional Revenue Divisional Officer within fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;

ii. Within two (2) months from the date of receipt thereof, the Revenue Divisional Officer is directed to consider and dispose of such appeal after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fifth respondent and any other person who would be affected by such decision; and

iii. There shall be no order as to costs. 15-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No apd To

1. The District Collector Sivagangai District SivagangaiSivagangai

2. The District Revenue Officer Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Sivagangai Sivagangai District.

4. The Tahsildar Sivagangai Taluk Sivagangai District.

WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. apd WP(MD) No. 29564 of 2026 15-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead