Madras High Court
APPEAL(CAD)/14/2025 of TRISTAR ACCOMMODATIONS LTD Vs VATHSALA JAGANNATHAN on 14 October 2026
APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GK.MUTHUKUMAAR
APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025
CNR:{HCMA010626902025}
AND
CMP NO. 10191 OF 2025
1. M/s.Tristar Accommodations Ltd
Rep. by its Managing Director,
Rashmi Rajan Kapoor,
No. 657, Tristar Towers, Avinashi Road,
Coimbatore-641 037.
2. Mrs.Padmini Rajan
W/o. V.Rajan
3. Uma Rajan
W/o. Late Naren Rajan
4. Rashmi Rajan Kapoor
W/o. Gaurav Kapoor
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. Vathsala Jagannathan
W/o. K.Jagannathan
2. Seshu Rajan
W/o. Gregory Hammond
..Respondent(s)
( Uploaded on: 23/10/2026 06:06:48 pm )
APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025
Appeal filed under Section 13(1A) of the Commerical Courts Act to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed by the Commercial Court (District Judge Cadre) at Coimbatore, dated 24.02.2025 in COS No. 140 of 2023.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.V.Pravin Rathinam
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Subramanian Vaidyanathan for R1
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.Sathish Kumar J.) Today, when the appeal was taken up, it was represented by both sides that the matter has been settled out of Court between the parties and the appellants/Defendants 1 to 4 have agreed to pay a sum of Rs.4,17,00,000/- to the first respondent/plaintiff towards the full and final settlement of the decree dated 24.02.2025 in C.O.S.No.140 of 2023. In this regard, a full satisfaction memo by the first respondent /plaintiff and a Memorandum of Compromise dated 08.10.2026 have also been filed.
2. In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise. The Full satisfaction memo filed by the first respondent/plaintiff and the Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of the decree. As the matter is settled out of Court, the appellant is entitled to refund of Court fee. Hence, Registry is directed to refund the Court as per the
( Uploaded on: 23/10/2026 06:06:48 pm )
APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025
applicable Rules. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (N.S.K.,J.) (G.K.M.,J.) 14-10-2026 gpa
( Uploaded on: 23/10/2026 06:06:48 pm )
APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025
N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND GK.MUTHUKUMAAR J. GPA APPEAL(CAD) No. 14 of 2025 & CMP NO. 10191 of 2025 14-10-2026
( Uploaded on: 23/10/2026 06:06:48 pm )