Himachal Pradesh High Court
EX.PT/77/2026 on 9 October 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.77 of 2026 Date of Decision: 09.10.2026 _______________________________________________________ Ajit Kumar Vashisht
…….Petitioners
Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record communication dated 19.09.2026, issued under the signature of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith sanction letter with respect to budget allocation, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands complied with.
2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds that after calculation, total arrears in respect of the petitioner amounting to Rs. 6,78,318/- have been
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:48:21 :::CIS
worked out, out of which first and second installments, amounting to Rs. 2,71,344/-, have been allocated to the concerned Treasury Office/DDO of the school on 11.09.2026 for further disbursal of the same to the petitioner. Learned Additional Advocate General states that remaining amount shall also be paid to the petitioner expeditiously.
3. Having taken note of the fact that two installments out of the total amount, as indicated hereinabove, have been ordered to be released, there appears to be no justification to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that aforesaid two installments, if not already credited to the bank account of the petitioner, are credited within a period of one week and thereafter, remaining amount is also paid within a period of three months, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards attachment of the property of the department as well as the salary of the erring official.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge October 09, 2026 (sunil)
High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 17:48:21 :::CIS