Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/22730/2026 of Kalimuthu Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. on 14 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011414432026}
Kalimuthu
S/o. Marimuthu,
No. 36, North Street,
M.K.Nagar,
Gandharva Kottai,
Pudukkottai District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
The Superintendent of Police,
Pudukkottai District.
2. The Inspector of Police
Gandarvakottai Police Station,
Pudukkottai District.
3. Maruthamuthu
S/o. Rajangam,
No. 11/1, North Street,
Narikollaipatti,
Valavampatti Post,
Gandarvakottai Taluk,
Pudukottai District.
4. Naveen
S/o. Maruthamuthu,
No. 11/1, North Street,
Narikollaipatti,
Valavampatti Post,
Gandarvakottai Taluk,
Pudukottai District.
__________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 11:24:26 am )
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026
5. Sakthi
S/o. Maruthamuthu,
No. 11/1, North Street,
Narikollaipatti,
Valavampatti Post,
Gandarvakottai Taluk,
Pudukottai District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: C-42D. To Direct the 2nd respondent to give Police Protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on his representation dated 28.09.2026 and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.Ramasamy
For Respondent(s):
Mr.B.Arun
Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R1 & R2
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.287 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent police seeking a direction to provide Police Protection to the petitioner's life and limb based on his representation dated 28.09.2026.
2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the accused has not been arrested and he is continuously threatening the petitioner herein.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the second respondent submitted that the third respondent had obtained an order of anticipated bail from the Principal District Court concerned and __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 11:24:26 am )
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026 therefore, they could not arrest him. He further submitted that if any specific complaint is lodged, they would consider the same.
4. In view of the above said facts, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's request for police protection, if specific incidents are brought to the notice of the second respondent and any cognizable offence is made out.
5. With the above said observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 14-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No msa __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 11:24:26 am )
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026 To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.
2. The Inspector of Police Gandarvakottai Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 11:24:26 am )
CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. msa CRL OP(MD) No. 22730 of 2026 14-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 11:24:26 am )