Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23504/2026 of M.Rani Vs The State of Tamilnadu on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 14-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011450352026}

M.Rani

W/o.Murugan,

No.14/32, Vembakottai Road,

Nadar Keelatheru,

Near Mangaiyarkarasi School,

Sattur,

Virudhunagar District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu

Rep by, The Superintendent of Police,

O/o.The Superintendent of Police,

Virudhunagar District.

2. The Inspector of Police

District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Inspector of Police

Sattur Town Police station, Virudhunagar District.

4. Revathi

W/o.Sadhasivam, No.70, Bharathiyar Street, Sattur, Virudhunagar District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 and their officials not to harass the petitioner and her family members unnecessarily against law under the guise of enquiry on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 01.10.2026.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026

For Petitioner(s):

M/s KARTHIGAIVEL A

For Respondent(s):

M/S. B. ARUN, GOVERNMENT

ADVOCATE (CRL. SIDE) FOR R1

TO R3

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition is filed seeking a direction as against the respondents two and three not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police, a complaint has been received as against the petitioner herein from the 4th respondent, alleging that taking advantage of her old age, jewels and money have been obtained from her. He further submits that summons have already been issued to the petitioner for the appearance on 01/10/2026. However, the petitioner has not chosen to appear.

3. Considering the above said facts, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026

4. With the aforesaid observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 14-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PNM To

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Virudhunagar District.

3. The Inspector of Police Sattur Town Police station, Virudhunagar District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 23504 of 2026 14-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead