Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23526/2026 of L.Chinnasamy Vs The State of Tamilnadu on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 14-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011462792026}

L.Chinnasamy

S/o.Lingasamy,

Thirumalairayapuram,

Sriramapuram Post,

Dindigul West Taluk,

Dindigul District.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu

Rep by,

The Superintendent of Police,

O/o.The Superintendent of Police,

Dindigul District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Ottanchatram Sub Division,

Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police

All Women Police Station,

Ottanchatram, Dindigul District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to direct the Respondent no.3/for not to harass the Petitioner and his wife on the basis of the Petitioner’ representation dated 28.09.2026 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s VIGNESH A

For Respondent(s):

M/S. B. ARUN, GOVERNMENT

ADVOCATE (CRL. SIDE)

CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the third respondent not to harass the petitioner and his wife on the basis of the petitioner’s representation, dated 28-09-2026.

2. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police, the daughter-in-law of the petitioner has lodged a complaint on 12/10/2026 before the third respondent and it was registered in CSR No.331 of 2026 to the effect that her Sridhana articles have not returned.

3. In such view of the matter, considering the age of the petitioner and his wife, the third respondent police are directed to issue appropriate summons to them and conduct preliminary enquiry. In any event, the said enquiry should be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026

4. With the aforesaid observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 14-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PNM To

1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Ottanchatram Sub Division, Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Ottanchatram, Dindigul District.

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 23526 of 2026 14-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead