Madras High Court

WP/213/2023 of Santhakumar Vs The District Collector on 14 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

WP No. 213 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 213 of 2023

CNR:{HCMA011713632022}

AND

WMP NO. 199 OF 2023

Santhakumar

16, Dwaraka Nilayam, Vivek Garden, Hosur, Krishnagiri District-635 109.

..Petitioner

Vs

1. The District Collector

Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar

Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Village Administrative Officer

Kukkandapalli Village, Hosur Taluk,

Krishnagiri District.

4. The District Revenue Officer,

Krishnagiri District.

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,

Krishnagiri District.

7. The Superintendent of Police,

Krishnagiri District.

WP No. 213 of 2023

8. The Deputy Tahsildar

Headquarters, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri

District.

9. The Station House Officer

Kukkandapalli Police Station, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

10.The revenue secretary

Revenue Department, Government of Tamil

Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George,

Chennai-08.

11.The Project Director

National Highways, Krishnagiri District.

12.The Commissioner

Hosur City corporation, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

13.The President,

Mukkandapalli Village Panchayat,

Mukkandapalli vilalge, Hosur taluk, Krishnagiri District.

14.Adhiruban Pastor,

St. Josephs Church, 7th Street Maruthi Nagar, Opposite Sivarangini Hotel, Hosur-635126.

(R14 IMPLEADED VIDE ORDER DT

11.01.2023 MADE IN WMP.947/2023 IN

WP.213/2023 BY ACJ, DBCJ)

..Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein more specifically the respondents 1 to 10 to take all steps necessary to demolish the illegal church / super structure being built as an Encroachment without Statutory proper approval or permission of the concerned authorities as violating all the Honourable Apex

WP No. 213 of 2023

Court guidelines and Judgements Acharaya Maharajshri Narandraprasadji Anandprasadji Maharaj Vs. State of Gujrat (1975) SCC (1)11, dated 03.10.1974 and Rev. Stanislaus Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (1977) (1) SCC

677, dated 17.01.1977 and Church of God (Full gospel) in India Vs.KKR

Majestic Colony Welfare Association and others-2000 (7) SCC 282, dated 30.08.2000 and T.Wilson Vs. District Collector Kanyakumari-2021 3 CTC 833

dated 29.04.2021 amongst other judgments and consequently remove the encroachment in survey Number 370/1, JF Road, Classified as Pattai Government Poramboke Land situated at Mukkandapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District within a reasonable time frame - based on the representation of the petitioner dated 09.04.2021, 16.04.2021, 07.06.2021 and 29.11.2021 and also taking into consideration Honourable Supreme Court Judgements in this regard.

For Petitioner :

Mr.B.Jagannath

For Respondent(s):

Mrs. E. Ranganayaki Agp. For Rr 1 To 3

Fr.Xavier Arulraj

for M/s. Father Xavier Associates for R14

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted to direct the respondents to take all steps necessary to demolish the illegal church / super structure being built as an Encroachment without Statutory proper approval or permission of the concerned authorities.

WP No. 213 of 2023

2. In the context of the relief sought for in the present writ petition and in pursuance to the direction issued by this Court to conduct enquiry and to file status report, the Tahsildar. Hosur has filed a status report. This Court also recorded the status report of the Tahsildar vide order dated 12.06.2026. The status report reveals the following facts. “ It is submitted that the land in S.No.370/1 extent 2.16.00 Hectare of Mookondapalli village has been classified as "J.F.Road Battai" in the Revenue/ Government records. "Battai" literally denotes path or road. The said road starts from Dharga Muthumariyamman kovil and ends at Titan Jwellery in Mookondapalli village. There are following encroachments in the land S.No.370/1 of Mookondapalli Village.

1. Christian church - 27 Cents.

2. Om Sakthi temple, Sai Baba temple, Shiva Temple-10 Cent.

3. Sivaranjani Hotel, Park, Vinayagar temple - 90 Cent.

4. Anjaneya Temple - 2 Cents

5. Houses- 2 Cent

6. Concrete shops - 2 Cents

7. Temporary encraochments like Petty shops, temporary hotels.

8. First Step Baby wear Private Ltd, - 7 Cents It is submitted that the Petitioner is said to be the joint secretary of Vishwa Hindu Parishad of Tamil Nadu unit and

WP No. 213 of 2023

the Petitioner has filed this public interest litigation Petition in this Honourable High Court with a prayer to demolish the church constructed by the Christian community people Now the construction work of the church has been stopped and a church building is in existence the said land. Prayer is being conducted in the church. The Petitioner being the Hindu outfit objects the existence of church in the said land. It is submitted that there are 7 encroachments in the said land. Immediate eviction of the encroachments will create law and order problem in the area. Hence a go slow policy has been taken in the matter. However, this Respondent will obey and implement the order of the High court. In the circumstances stated above it is humbly prayed to this Honourable court pleased to accept this Status Report and pas suitable orders, as this Honourable Court deem fit and proper and thus render justice.”

3. Learned Government Pleader would submit that show cause notice under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act has been issued to the encroachers, affording opportunity to the encroachers to submit their explanations. On receipt of the explanation, it is to be considered by the competent authorities and final notice under Section 6 is to be issued. Thereafter, enforcement actions are to be executed.

WP No. 213 of 2023

4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the 14th respondent would submit that the petitioner is targeting the 14th respondent alone knowing the fact that there are other encroachers. He would submit that the petitioner would have to raise objections against all encroachments including the one made by the 14th respondent.

5. This Court cannot form an opinion regarding the entire encroachments in the present writ petition. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the encroachments identified by the Tahsildar in his status report. In respect of other encroachments, if any exists, the 14th respondent or any other person is at liberty to file a complaint to the competent authority, who in turns shall take all appropriate actions in the manner known to law. As far as the status report is concerned, the details regarding encroachments are stated by the Tahsildar and already notice has been issued under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act.

6. This being the factum, the official respondents are directed to proceed with the enforcement action by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant Statutes and Rules in force and remove the encroachments, and allow the government land to be utilised for public purpose for usage of the

WP No. 213 of 2023

public. The entire exercise is to be directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 14-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST

WP No. 213 of 2023

To

1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Village Administrative Officer Kukkandapalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

4. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District.

5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District.

8. The Deputy Tahsildar Headquarters, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

9. The Station House Officer Kukkandapalli Police Station, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

10. The revenue secretary Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-08.

WP No. 213 of 2023

11. The Project Director National Highways, Krishnagiri District.

12. The Commissioner Hosur City corporation, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

13. The President, Mukkandapalli Village Panchayat, Mukkandapalli vilalge, Hosur taluk, Krishnagiri District.

WP No. 213 of 2023

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 213 of 2023 AND WMP NO. 199 OF 2023 14-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead