Madras High Court
WP CRL./2680/2026 of M.Deivanai Vs The State Rep. by, The Commissioner of Police on 14 October 2026
WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012392282026}
M.Deivanai
W/o Muthukrishnan,
No.85, 3rd Street,
Karunanithi Nagar, Tondiarpet,
Chennai.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State Rep. by, The Commissioner of Police Office of Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police
H-6, R.K.Nagar Police Station(Crime),
Korukkupet, Chennai.
3. R.Pavithra
W/o Ramesh,
Door No.96, 4th Street,
Pallava Nagar, Tondiarpet,
Chennai.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or order or direction directing the respondents to consider Petitioner’s representation dt.07.09.2026, consequently transfer the Petitioner’s case to the superior officer for investigation and pass such further or other order as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.S.N.Subramani
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 05:36:10 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026
For Respondent(s):
Mr.Arun Anbumani,
Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 And R2
Mr.Arun Shabari for R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Mr.S.N.Subramani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Arun Anbumani, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.Arun Shabari, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent.
2. The petitioner seeks transfer of investigation of the complaint lodged by her with the second respondent. Mr.Arun Anbumani, on instructions, submits that the second respondent had conducted an enquiry and had found that it was not a case which required registration of an FIR and therefore, closed the complaint.
3. The fervent plea of Mr.S.N.Subramani is that the entire case projected by the third respondent is false and frivolous. This is a plea which will have to be addressed by the petitioner before the jurisdictional Magistrate, in whose Court, STC Nos.1525 and 1527 of 2026 are pending consideration. In a writ petition, Mr.S.N.Subramani cannot attempt to create a defence for his criminal proceedings.
4. With the above observation, the writ petition dismissed. 14-10-2026 Index: Yes/No KAL
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 05:36:10 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026
To
1. The State Rep. by, The Commissioner of Police Office of Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police H-6, R.K.Nagar Police Station(Crime), Korukkupet, Chennai.
3. R.Pavithra W/o Ramesh, Door No.96, 4th Street, Pallava Nagar, Tondiarpet, Chennai.
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 05:36:10 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. KAL WP Crl. No. 2680 of 2026 14-10-2026 c
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 05:36:10 pm )