Madras High Court

WP(MD)/29330/2026 of M.Jenil Vs The Passport Officer on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 14-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR

RAMAMOORTHY

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011438822026}

M.Jenil

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Passport Officer

The Passport Office,

Bharathi Ula Veethi,

Race Course Road,

Madurai - 625002.Madurai

2. The Inspector of Police

Vellichanthai Police Station,

Kanyakumari District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, directing the Respondent to issue a passport to the petitioner by considering his Passport Application vide file ho. MD2074932496726 dated 17.08.2026

within a stipulated period as prescribed by this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

M/s P.Rengaraju

For Respondent(s):

Mr.V.B.Sundhareshwar, CGSC

for R1

Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz, GA( Crl.)

for R2

__________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The petitioner applied for reissuance of a passport on 17.08.2026. Asserting that mere pendency of an FIR is not a ground to refuse to process the application, the present petition was filed.

2. Mr.V.B.Sundhareshwar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the first respondent and Mr.R.Mohamed Riyaz, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the second respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the first respondent submits that a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner and that the petitioner has approached this Court prematurely.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner responds by stating that the show cause notice was replied to.

5. Learned Government Advocate for the second respondent confirms that no charge sheet has been filed till date. __________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026

6. Considering the above submissions, there is no impediment to the processing of the application for reissuance of the passport. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's passport application and take a decision with regard thereto within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 14-10-2026 PKN __________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026 To

1. The Passport Officer The Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai - 625002.Madurai

2. The Inspector of Police Vellichanthai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. __________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

WP(MD) No. 29330 of 2026 14-10-2026 __________

( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 08:43:23 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead