Madras High Court
CONT P(MD)/960/2026 of R.Radhakrishnan Vs Muthukrishnan on 13 October 2026
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.D.SUMATHI
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD010326762026}
R.Radhakrishnan
S/o.Poovalingam,
6-12-15, Immanuel School Street,
Batlagundu,
Dindigul District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
Muthukrishnan
The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai)
Limited,
Dindigul Region,
Dindigul.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Contemnor/Appellant for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court dated 01.07.2025 in WA(MD) No.903 of 2022 and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s)
: Mr.S.Arunachalam
For Respondent(s)
: Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro
Standing Counsel
__________
( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 03:46:43 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.
2. The order passed by us has been partly complied with. The General Manager of TNSTC (Madurai) Limited has filed an affidavit and he has also indicated the time schedule for payment of the balance amount. It is proposed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) per month. By October 2027, all the instalments would have been cleared. We expect the respondents to adhere to the undertaking given before us. If default is committed, even for a single month, the petitioner's counsel can make a mention and this contempt petition will be reopened thereafter. The respondent cannot expect any mercy from us thereafter.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the amount quantified by the respondent does not include certain components. We permit the petitioner's counsel to serve a calculation memo on the standing counsel. The learned Standing Counsel states that the proposal is to be submitted shortly. The said proposal will take into account the memo to be served by the petitioner's counsel.
4. This Contempt Petition is closed accordingly. __________
( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 03:46:43 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026 (G.R.S.,J.) (M.D.S.,J.) 13-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MGA __________
( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 03:46:43 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026 To The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindigul. __________
( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 03:46:43 pm )
CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND M.D.SUMATHI, J. MGA CONT P(MD) No. 960 of 2026 13-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 14/10/2026 03:46:43 pm )