Madras High Court
WP/40706/2026 of The Global Hospitality Vs The Commercial Tax officer(ST) on 13 October 2026
WP No. 40706 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
WP No. 40706 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA012172232026}
AND
WMP NO. 45666 OF 2026
The Global Hospitality,
Rep by its Proprietrix
Ms Aruna R.,
1st Floor, 51, PPS Colony,
Anna Nagar 5th Street, Peelamedu,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 004.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The Commercial Tax Officer (ST),
Peelamedu South Circle, Coimbatore-641 018.
2. The Deputy State Tax Officer (ST),
O/o the Assistant Commissioner ST,
Peelamedu South Circle, Ground Floor,
CTO Complex, Dr. Balasundaram Road,
Coimbatore.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent vide the impugned ex parte Order issued in Form GST DRC-07 bearing Reference No. ZD331225111448P dated 08.12.2025, and quash the same as it is in violation of Principles of Natural Justice, and to further direct the 1st respondent to pass fresh order on merits after hearing the petitioner.
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
For Petitioner(s):
M/s.Prageetha J
For Respondent(s):
Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran
Government Advocate (T)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent.
2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, in the present case, the petitioner had not received physical copies of either the show cause notice or the notice of personal hearing. The show cause notice dated 23.09.2025 was merely uploaded on the GST Portal, which the petitioner had no occasion to access. Even the impugned order dated 08.12.2025 was uploaded on the GST Portal, without furnishing a physical copy to the petitioner. Hence she would submit that the impugned order has been passed in violation of principle
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
of natural justice. She would further submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand in respect of the impugned assessment period and prayed to set aside the impugned order directing the 1st respondent to permit the petitioner to file their reply and provide an opportunity of personal hearing so that the petitioner would be able to substantiate their case.
5. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that if this Court feels that the matter warrants reconsideration, in terms of the voluntary submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, upon the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax demand for the impugned assessment period, the impugned order may be set aside and the matter may be remanded for reconsideration.
6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record.
7. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and upon perusal of the materials, it is evident that the impugned show cause notice was uploaded on the GST Portal. According to the petitioner,
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
the petitioner was not aware of the issuance of the show cause notice through the GST Portal and a physical copy of the said show cause notice was not served on the petitioner. In such circumstances, when the 1st respondent did not receive any reply/response from the petitioner to the show causes notice and when the statute provides for alternative modes of service of notice, it is incumbent upon the 1st respondent to adopt an effective mode of service instead of repeatedly uploading the notices and reminders on the common portal. If such an effective mode of service has been adopted, the petitioner would have not been in a position to contend before this Court that the notices were not received.
8. Thus, this Court is of the view that the impugned order came to be passed without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner to establish their case, thereby violating the principles of natural justice and that it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to establish their case on merits and in accordance with law.
9. For the reasons stated above, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 08.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent. Accordingly, this Court pass the following orders:-
(i) The order impugned herein is set aside on condition that the petitioner deposits 25% of the disputed tax amount in
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
respect of the impugned assessment period, as agreed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) The petitioner is at liberty to make the aforesaid 25% deposit after deducting the amount, if any paid subsequent to the issuance of the impugned assessment order.
(iii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of two weeks thereafter.
(iv) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the 1st respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice by fixing the date of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.
10. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 13-10-2026 (1/2) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rst
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
To
1. The Commercial Tax Officer (ST), Peelamedu South Circle, Coimbatore-641 018.
2. The Deputy State Tax Officer (ST) O/o the Assistant Commissioner ST, Peelamedu South Circle, Ground Floor, CTO Complex, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore.
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )
WP No. 40706 of 2026
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 40706 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 45666 OF 2026 13-10-2026 (1/2)
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:48 pm )