WP(MD)/29440/2026 of B.A.Abishek Vs The Management of on 13 October 2026

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest to the petitioners at the rate of 6% per annum for the belated payment of terminal benefits due to their deceased father, an employee of the respondent transport Corporation, from the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment, within the time stipulated by this Court.

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026

2. The case of the petitioners is that their father, namely, R.Baburajan was appointed as a Junior Tradesman in the respondent Transport Corporation on 01.09.1991. He retired from service as Special Grade Tradesman Level 4, on 31.12.2023. After his retirement, he died on 29.04.2024. The terminal benefits were settled belatedly, ie. on 11.09.2025. Since the retirement benefits have been settled belatedly, the respondents are liable to pay interest for the belated payment. Therefore, the petitioners gave a representation dated 30.03.2026 to the respondents, however, the same did not evoke any response. Therefore, the petitioners have filed this writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in similar writ petitions, this Court has ordered for payment of interest at the rate of 6% p.a. for the belated payment of retirement benefits and therefore, the petitioners are also entitled for the same relief.

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026

4. It is reported on behalf of the respondent that the terminal benefits of the petitioners’ father have been settled on 11.09.2025.

5. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.

6. This Court paid its anxious consideration to the rival submissions made and also perused the materials placed on record.

7. The employer is liable to settle the retirement benefits to its employees without any delay and in case, if it is settled belatedly, it has to be compensated by way of interest for the belated payment. In this regard, the Hon'ble Apex Court in S.K.Dua vs. State of Haryana reported in 2008 (3) SCC 44, has held as follows: “14. In the circumstances, prima facie, we are of the view that the grievance voiced by the appellant

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026 appears to be well founded that he would be entitled to interest on such benefits. If there are statutory rules occupying the field, the appellant could claim payment of interest relying on such rules. If there are administrative instructions, guidelines or norms prescribed for the purpose, the appellant may claim benefit of interest on that basis. But even in absence of statutory rules, administrative instructions or guidelines, an employee can claim interest under Part III of the Constitution relying on Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant, that retiral benefits are not in the nature of “bounty” is, in our opinion well founded and needs no authority in support thereof. In that view of the matter, in our considered opinion, the High Court was not right in dismissing the petition in living even without issuing notice to the respondents.”

8. Following the same, in a similar issue, a Division Bench of this Court, in W.A.(MD)No.403 of 2010, etc. batch, vide common order dated 04.07.2014, has fixed the rate of interest at 6%

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026 per annum and held as under:- “5. ..... even though there is no provision in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund for payment of interest, cannot stand in the light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in S.K.Dua v. State of Haryana and another, reported in (2008) 3 SCC 44. As a matter of fact, the Rules do not contemplate belated payment of retirement benefits. The Rules contemplate prompt payment. When the Rules contemplate prompt payment and not bleated payment, the Rules will not contain a provision for payment of interest. The Pension Fund which was created as a Trust by the Corporation was supposed to act in trust for the employees' benefit. If the Trust could not make payments within the time stipulated, then, irrespective of whether there is any provision for payment of interest or not, the Corporation is obliged to make payment.”

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026

9. Following the dictum laid down on the issue, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the eligible terminal benefits of the deceased employee, that were disbursed belatedly, from the date of his retirement till the date of actual disbursement, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 13-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VRN

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026 To The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Ltd, Nagercoil Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Nagercoil.Kanniyakumari

WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026 B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn Order made in WP(MD) No. 29440 of 2026 13.10.2026