Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23279/2026 of E. Meera Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. on 12 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011445312026}
E. Meera
W/o. Late Eswaran,
Residing at Door No.
40, Nagal Nagar,
4th Street,
Dindigul East Taluk,
Dindigul District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The
Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District Dindigul.
2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dindigul North Police Station,
3. Senthilkumar
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: This petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to Direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate Police Protection to the life and limb of the Petitioner/and her family members.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.A. CHANDRAKUMAR
For Respondent(s):
M/S. B. ARUN, GOVERNMENT
ADVOCATE (CRL. SIDE) FOR R1
AND R2
CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to R1 and R2 to provide adequate police protection to life and limb of the petitioner and her family members.
2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, she has rented out the premises to one Satish Kumar and there is a landlord tenant dispute and already a suit is pending before the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul in OS No.173 of 2025.
3. The learned counsel further submits that the third respondent herein has no connection whatsoever with the property and he has trespassed into the property and he is threatening the petitioner herein and therefore, she has lodged a complaint on 27.09.2026 seeking police protection.
4. The Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents police submitted that the third respondent has given a letter on 27.09.2026 to the effect that he has no connection whatsoever with the building and therefore, he would agitate the case as against Satish Kumar before the appropriate civil forum, and, therefore, the complaint was
CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026 closed on 27.09.2026, directing the parties to approach the competent Court.
5. in such view of the matter, no further orders are called for. this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 12-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PNM To
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District Dindigul.
2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dindigul North Police Station,
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor,Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. PNM CRL OP(MD) No. 23279 of 2026 12-10-2026