Madras High Court
CRP/6494/2026 of Haji (Died) 1.Syed Hassain Vs Manjunath on 12 October 2026
CRP No. 6494 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
CRP No. 6494 of 2026
CMP No. 27944 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA011564842026}
Haji (Died)
1.Syed Hassain
2. Shajitha
3. Mallika Bi
4.Syed Mafeez
5.Famitha
6.Habida Bi
7.Farida
8.Shahida Bi
9.Irshad Bash
(Cause title accepted vide
court order dated 19.08.2026
made in C.M.P.No.22646 of 2026
in C.R.P.Sr.No.114118 of 2026 (PBBJ))
...Petitioners
Vs
1. Manjunath
2. Yuvaraj
3. Madhangiri
..Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, pleased to strike off the suit in O.S.No.45 of 2014 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Denkanikottai as abuse of process of law, fraudulent, non-est in the eyes of law and declare the preliminary decree dated 13.08.2014 passed in O.S.No.45 of 2014 as null and void.
CRP No. 6494 of 2026
For Petitioners:
Mr.C. Sai Krishna
for Mr.S.Eshwar
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the preliminary decree for partition passed by the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, in O.S.No.45 of 2014.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that, though they are not party to the decree challenged in revision, the subject matter of the suit dealt with in O.S.No.45 of 2014 are properties of the petitioners, and hence they are aggrieved by the said decree. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the decree, it is always open to them to file an application seeking leave before the regular first Appellate Court and file a first appeal after getting necessary leave. In view of the availability of an effective remedy before the regular Civil Court, that is, First Appellate Court, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Civil Revision Petition in the light of the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai and others Vs. Tuticorin Educational Society and orders reported in (2019) 9 SCC 538.
CRP No. 6494 of 2026
3. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy before the first Appellate Court. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 12-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rya / ep To:- The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Denkanikottai.
CRP No. 6494 of 2026
S.SOUNTHAR, J. rya / ep CRP No. 6494 of 2026 C.M.P.No.27944 of 2026 12-10-2026