Madras High Court
CRP/6533/2026 of The Supervising Electrical Engineer TNEB Vs Kamaraj on 12 October 2026
CRP No. 6533 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
CRP No. 6533 of 2026
CMP No.28164 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012354152026}
1. The Supervising Electrical Engineer
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, (TNEB)
Kallakurichi.
2. The Executive Engineer
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) O&M, Sankarapuram.
3. The Assistant Executive Electrical Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB), Sankarapuram.
4. The Junior Electrical Engineer
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB)O&M,
Sankarapuram.
...Petitioners
Vs
Kamaraj
...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, pleased to set aside the order dated 17.09.2026 passed in E.P.No.151
of 2025 in O.S.No.161 of 2016 on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Sankarapuram.
For Petitioners:
Mr.S.T.Raja
CRP No. 6533 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Sub Court, Sankarapuram, in E.P.No.151 of 2025 in O.S.No.161 of 2016.
2. The respondent herein filed a suit seeking recovery of compensation from the petitioners / Electricity Board. The said suit was decreed on 31.01.2025, directing the petitioners / Electricity Board to pay a sum of Rs.9,60,906/- together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum. The said decree is put into execution in E.P. No. 151 of 2025. The Executing Court, by the impugned order passed an attachment order against the movables of the petitioners / Electricity Board. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners had come before this Court.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that, challenging the decree passed by the Trial Court, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the Appellate Court with a delay. In the meantime, an attachment order has been passed by the Executing Court. The learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to disclose the details of the appeal filed by the petitioners before the first Appellate Court.
CRP No. 6533 of 2026
4. It is seen from the typed set of papers that the decree was passed against the petitioners on 31.01.2025. If the first appeal is already preferred by the petitioners, it is for them to work out their remedy by seeking necessary interim order from the first Appellate Court after condonation of delay. Since there is no stay by the first Appellate Court, the Executing Court rightly proceeded with E.P.No.151 of 2025 and passed the attachment order. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this Civil Revision Petition.
5. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rya / ep To:- The Subordinate Judge, Sankarapuram.
CRP No. 6533 of 2026
S.SOUNTHAR, J. rya / ep CRP No. 6533 of 2026 CMP No.28164 of 2026 12-10-2026