Madras High Court
WP CRL./2711/2026 of Rajendiran Vs The Tahsildar on 12 October 2026
WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012410272026}
Rajendiran
S/o Chethan (Late),
No.3/1, Matthalikadu,
Errachinnampatti,
E.Pethampatti, Salem-636 203.
..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Tahsildar
Puthur Agraharam,
Salem West Taluk,
Salem-636 010.
2.The Inspector of Police
Kondalampatti Police Station,
Salem-636 010.
3.Sendraayan
S/o Seerangaraj,
Vellakottai, Neikkaranpatti,
Salem-636 010.
..Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner as well as revenue authorities at the time of survey in respect of the land situated in Survey No.478/1B, Puthur Agraharam Village, Salem District, is carried out peacefully and without any obstruction while inspecting and measuring the property.
For Petitioner:
Mr. J. Jayakumar
__________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:44 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026
For R1:
For R2:
Ms.Poornima
Additional Government Pleader
Mr. S. Yogaraja Sekar
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Ms. Poornima, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for the first respondent. Mr. S. Yogaraja Sekar, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), takes notice for the second respondent.
2. When the matter was taken up, Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar reports that the survey was completed on 01.10.2026 and boundary stones have also been laid.
3. Mr. J.Jayakumar reports that the third respondent is attempting to remove those boundary stones and encroach upon the petitioner's property. If that being the situation, the remedy in this writ petition lies before the Civil Court and not before the police authorities. As the purpose for which the writ petition was filed has already been executed, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 09-10-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:44 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026 To
1. The Tahsildar Puthur Agraharam, Salem West Taluk, Salem-636 010.
2. The Inspector of Police Kondalampatti Police Station, Salem-636 010. __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:44 pm )
WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. KJ WP Crl. No. 2711 of 2026 09-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 15/10/2026 03:00:44 pm )