Madras High Court
WP(MD)/29323/2026 of R.Damodharan Vs The District Collector on 12 October 2026
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011333142026}
R.Damodharan
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The District Collector
Madurai District Collectorate
Madurai.Madurai
2. The District Revenue Officer
Office Of The District Collector
Madurai District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer
Thirumangalam Revenue Division
Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
4. The Tahsildar
Tahsildar Office
Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
5. The Head Survey Officer
Tahsildar Office
Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
6. The Village Administrative Officer
Uchapatti Village
Kappalur
Madurai District.
__________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026
7. Trust Dhanapandiyan, Guardian
Represented By Its Chairman, Pandiyan
Sasikala Educational Uchapatti Village
Thirumangalam Taluk
Madurai District.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the 1st Respondent take necessary action against the Respondents 4 to 6 based on the petitioner’s representation dated 06.08.2026 in accordance with law.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr R.Sundar
For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.Selva Aditya
Government Advocate
for R1 to R6
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
By consent, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Mr.S.Selva Aditya, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents 1 to 6. Since no adverse orders are going to be passed, notice to the seventh respondent is dispensed with.
3. Aggrieved by the issuance of patta in favour of the seventh respondent, the petitioner has lodged a complaint against the respondents 4 to 6, and __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 has filed this Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to take action against the respondents 4 to 6.
4. The learned Government Advocate raised a preliminary objection and pointed out that, as against the grant of patta, the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy by way of an appeal before the third respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam. He further submitted that the petitioner has already submitted a representation before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirumangalam, which has been treated as an appeal and is pending consideration.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been insisting upon a survey of the subject property. However, without conducting a proper survey, patta has been issued in favour of the seventh respondent.
6. This Court considered the rival submissions made and perused the materials placed on record.
7. As rightly pointed out by the learned Government Advocate, the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy by way of an appeal before __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 the third respondent. It appears that the representation submitted by the petitioner has also been treated as an appeal by the third respondent and is pending consideration.
8. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The petitioner is directed to file a formal appeal before the third respondent, setting out all the grounds of challenge, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
(ii) The third respondent is directed to verify whether a survey of the subject property has been conducted in the presence of the petitioner. If no proper survey has been conducted, the third respondent shall ensure that a proper survey is conducted in the presence of the petitioner and the rival parties.
(iii) Thereafter, the third respondent shall consider the appeal filed by the petitioner on its merits, in accordance with law and on the basis of the documents, if any, placed before the authority, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the rival parties, and pass __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 appropriate orders within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the appeal. No costs. 12-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No mbi __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 To
1. The District Collector Madurai District Collectorate Madurai.Madurai
2. The District Revenue Officer Office Of The District Collector Madurai District.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thirumangalam Revenue Division Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
4. The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
5. The Head Survey Officer Tahsildar Office Thirumangalam, Madurai District.
6. The Village Administrative Officer Uchapatti Village Kappalur
Madurai District. __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )
WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 B.PUGALENDHI, J. mbi WP(MD) No. 29323 of 2026 12-10-2026 __________
( Uploaded on: 28/10/2026 11:13:04 am )