Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23086/2026 of Rajamani Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep on 9 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011421862026}
Rajamani
S/o. Muthuvel,
Kuththampoondi Valasu,
Kothayam,
Ottanchathram Taluk,
Dindigul District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep., by the Superintendent of Police,
Dindigul District,
Dindigul.
2. The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep., by the Inspector Of Police,
District Crime Branch-II
Theni District.
3. The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep., by the Sub Inspector Of Police,
District Crime Branch-II
4. Sasikala
D.No.436,
Kattapomman Street,
Velankurichi Road,
Coimbatore South,
Peelamedu,
Coimbatore District.
..Respondent(s)
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026
PRAYER: C-41D.To direct the 1st respondent to give direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to interfere in the civil dispute pending disposal of the OS.No.41 of 2025 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ottanchathram, and not to harass the petitioner.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.T.Ramasamy
For Respondent(s):
Mr.B.Arun
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
For R1 to R3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and not to interfere in the civil dispute.
2. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing on behalf of the 3rd respondent, the 4th respondent has purchased the property from the petitioner and later found that the property has been mortgaged to a finance company. Suppressing the same the sale deed has been executed to the petitioner.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026
3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, he had purchased the property from his vendor in the year 2016 and he had not mortgaged the property. On the other hand, the property had been mortgaged by his vendor, and therefore, there was no suppression on the part of the petitioner.
4. Considering the above said facts, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. The criminal original petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions. 09-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rgm
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026 To
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., by the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., by the Inspector Of Police, District Crime Branch-II Theni District.
3. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep., by the Sub Inspector Of Police, District Crime Branch-II Dindigul District.
4. Sasikala D.No.436, Kattapomman Street, Velankurichi Road, Coimbatore South, Peelamedu, Coimbatore District.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. rgm CRL OP(MD) No. 23086 of 2026 09-10-2026