Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23163/2026 of Manimaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By In on 9 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011358322026}
Manimaran
S/o.Srinivasan,
Roja Complex,
AndipattiBangala,
Vadipatti Taluk,
Madurai District.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu,
Rep., by the Inspector Of Police,
Dindigul Taluk Police Station,
Dindigul District.
Crime No.15/2026.
2. Sivasamy
S/o.Palanisamy,
No.10 Pasupathy Nagar,
Kollampudhur,.
Balakrishnapuram,
Dindigul.
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: C-51Q. To call for the entire records in S.C.No.196 of 2026
pending on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul and quash the same as illegal and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner(s):
Mr.B.Sekar
For R1:
Mr.V.Shathurthi Raja
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by the sole accused in S.C.No.196 of 2026 pending on the file of the learned Principal District Court, Dindigul, wherein he is charged with the offence under Sections 329(4), 296(b) and 109 of BNS, 2023.
2. A perusal of the charge sheet reveals that the petitioner herein is said to have attacked the de-facto complainant and his wife at about 3.30 A.M. on 12.01.2026, due to a motive over a property dispute. The de-facto complainant and his wife have sustained to grievous injuries and they have taken treatment initially in a Government Hospital and thereafter in the private hospital.
3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the motive has not been established and the accused has not been identified properly by the de-facto complaint.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the material records of the case.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026
5. As could be seen from the charge sheet, specific overt acts are alleged as against the petitioner to the effect that he had attacked the de- facto complaint and his wife at about 3.30 A.M. on 12.01.2026 in which they have sustained grievous injuries in the head.
6. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. The presence of the petitioner shall stand dispensed with before the trial Court unless specifically directed by the concerned Court.
7. In view of the above said facts, this Court finds no merits in the present petition. Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands dismissed. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the case on merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No rgm
CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. rgm To
1. State Of Tamilnadu, Rep., by the Inspector Of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District. Crime No.15/2026.
2. The Principal District Judge, Dindigul
3. Sivasamy S/o.Palanisamy, No.10 Pasupathy Nagar, Kollampudhur,. Balakrishnapuram, Dindigul. CRL OP(MD) No. 23163 of 2026 09.10.2026