Madras High Court
REV.APLW/244/2026 of The Secretary Vs M.VIGNESH on 9 October 2026
Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026
and
W.M.P.No.41579 of 2026
CNR:{HCMA011596932026}
The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
No.3, TNPSC Road,
Chennai – 600 003.
... Petitioner
Vs
1. M.Vignesh
2. The Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, 5th, Aavin Illam, 3A, Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar Road, Rathana Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 035.
... Respondents
Prayer : Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 2 of C.P.C., praying to review the order passed in W.P.No.27718 of 2025 dated 04.02.2026.
For Petitioner
: Mr.R.Bharanidharan
For Respondents
: Ms.S.Suneetha [R1]
Mr.A.Sivaji [R2]
*****
Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Review Application has been filed seeking to review the final order dated 04.02.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.No.27718 of 2025.
2. Learned counsel for the review petitioner submitted that the first respondent herein had filed a Writ Petition in W.P.No.27718 of 2025, seeking to quash the impugned selection list issued by the review petitioner, dated 18.06.2025 and for a consequential direction to the review petitioner to admit the writ petitioner/first respondent to the process of physical certificate verification and oral interview, and this Court, vide order, dated 04.02.2026, allowed the said Writ petition by setting aside the impugned selection list dated 18.06.2025 insofar as the petitioner's register number alone, and directed the review petitioner to select the writ petitioner and forward the selection list to the second respondent, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, and thereafter, the second respondent was directed to appoint the writ petitioner, within a period of two weeks. Hence, the petitioner has come up with this Review application.
Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026
3. Review applications can be entertained only on the ground of error apparent on the face of records or clerical error. In the present case, learned counsel for the petitioner raised issue on the factual aspect which cannot be entertained by way of the present Review application and a new ground which has not been canvassed cannot be the basis for filing the review application. Hence, this Court is of the view that, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be acceded to and is liable to be dismissed.
4. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sp To The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd., 5th, Aavin Illam, 3A, Pasumpon Muthuramalinga Thevar Road, Rathana Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu – 600 035.
Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026
M.DHANDAPANI J. sp Rev.Aplw.No.244 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.41579 of 2026 09-10-2026