Madras High Court

WP/41177/2026 of DEVI FURNITURE Vs Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP No. 41177 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN

WP No. 41177 of 2026

CNR:{HCMA012361872026}

AND

WMP Nos. 46208 &46209 OF 2026

Devi Furniture

Rep. by its Proprietor MR.P.Saravanan, No.78, Parthasarathy Nagar, Part - II, Vilangadupakkam, Chennai - 600052.

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) Rep. by its Member Secretary, Egmore, chennai – 600008.

2. Government of Tamilnadu

Rep. by its Additional Secretary, (technical)

Housing and Urban development department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600009.

3. Vilangadupakkam village panchayat

Rep. by its President/Executive Officer, Puzhal panchayat Union, ponneri taluk, Thiruvallur District - 600066.

4. The Commissioner,

Puzhal Panchayat Union, puzhal, ponneri

Taluk, Thiruvallur District - 602001.

..Respondents

WP No. 41177 of 2026

Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Letter.No.CMDA/PP/NHRB/N/0317/2026 dated 14.07.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to sanction planning approval as contemplated under section 49 r/w section 56(3) of the tamilnadu town and country planning act, 1971 to retain the building in question.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Sadasharam

For Respondent(s):

Ms.S.Mridula Royan

Standing Counsel for R1

Mr.K.Surender

Special Government Pleader – for R2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition and has made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

2. Recording the said submission and the endorsement made, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (R.R.V.,J.) 09-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No KST

WP No. 41177 of 2026

To

1. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) egmore, chennai – 600008.

2. Government of Tamilnadu Rep. by its Additional Secretary, (technical) Housing and Urban development department, fort st.george, secretariat, chennai - 600009.

3. Vilangadupakkam village panchayat Rep. by its President/Executive Officer, puzhal panchayat Union, ponneri taluk, Thiruvallur District - 600066.

4. The Commissioner, Puzhal Panchayat Union, puzhal, ponneri taluk, Thiruvallur District - 602001.

WP No. 41177 of 2026

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND R.RAJESH VIVEKANANTHAN J. KST WP No. 41177 of 2026 09-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead