Madras High Court

WP(MD)/29141/2026 of M.Vijayalakshmi Vs The District Collector on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 09-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011438722026}

M.Vijayalakshmi

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The District Collector,

Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

Melur Division,

Madurai District.

3. The Tahsildar,

Madurai East Taluk,

Madurai District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s appeal application dated 18.09.2026

seeking grant of patta in respect of the property comprised in Grama Survey No.

119/13, Arumbanur Bit-II, Arumbanur Firka, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District, measuring an extent of 0.54.0 Ares (1 Acre 33 Cents), on merits and in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing and taking into consideration the documents and records produced by her within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026

For Petitioner

:Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram

For Respondents

:Mr.M.Dinesh Hari Sudarsan

Additional Government Pleader

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking a direction against the second respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s appeal application dated 18.09.2026 seeking grant of patta in respect of the subject property.

2. Heard Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Dinesh Hari Sudarsan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought in the present Writ Petition, this Court is inclined to issue the following directions: “The second respondent is directed to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for grant of patta and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve

WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

4. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 09-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No cmr To

1. The District Collector Madurai District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Melur Division Madurai District.

3. The Tahsildar, Madurai East Taluk, Madurai District.

WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. cmr WP(MD) No. 29141 of 2026 09-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead