Madras High Court

CMA/2350/2021 of M.EASWARI Vs A.BARATH KUMAR on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

AND

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

and

CMP No. 13199 OF 2021

CNR:{HCMA010924212021}

M.Easwari

..Appellant

Vs

A.Barath Kumar

... Respondent

Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 of CPC read with Section 19 of Family Courts Act, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 29.03.2021 made in I.A.No.3 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.215

of 2019 on the file of Family Court, Tiruvallur and to allow the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

For Appellant:

Mr.C.Arivazhagan

For Respondent:

No Appearance

*****

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Judgment

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Dhandapani J.) Aggrieved by the fair and decretal order passed by the Family Court, Tiruvallur in I.A.No.3 of 2023 in H.M.O.P.No.215 of 2019, dated 29.03.2021, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

2. The appellant is the wife of the respondent. The respondent/husband filed H.M.O.P.No.215 of 2019 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvallur, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce and an ex-parte order was passed on 20.12.2019. To set aside the ex-parte order, the appellant filed an interim application in I.A.No.2 of 2020 in H.M.O.P.No.215 of 2019, under Order IX Rule 7 r/w Section 151 of CPC. Although the application was initially allowed on 13.03.2020, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/-, subsequently, it was dismissed on 20.10.2020 due to the non-payment of the said costs. Thereafter, an ex-parte divorce decree was granted in favour of the respondent. To set aside the ex-parte decree, the appellant again filed a petition in I.A.No.3 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.215 of 2019 under Order IX Rule 13 r/w 151 of CPC, which was dismissed on 29.03.2021. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant has preferred this appeal.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the primary grievance of the appellant is that the divorce was granted ex-parte, and the entire proceedings were conducted by the trial court during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, from 2020 to 2021 and the government had imposed

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

restrictions on the movement of the parties. Hence, he prays that this Court may set aside the order and remand the matter to the Trial Court for fresh adjudication.

4. Though the name of the respondent was printed in the cause list today, no one appeared on behalf of the respondent, however, considering the pendency of the appeal, this Court is inclined to dispose of this appeal based on the materials available on record. In this case, evidence of the appellant has not been recorded and only based on the respondent side evidence, the trial court passed order as the appellant was not appeared before the trial court. Since the appellant has not appeared before the trial court to adduce evidence, considering the nature of dispute and facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to give one more chance to the appellant to put-forth his case before the trial court, thereby it is appropriate to set aside the fair and decreetal order of the trial court without going into the merits of the case.

5. This Court graciously considered the facts and circumstances to set aside the ex-parte order dated 29.03.2021, and deems it fit to remand the matter back to the Trial Court for fresh consideration. Accordingly, the impugned order

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

dated 29.03.2021 passed by the Trial Court is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Trial Court for fresh consideration, on condition that the appellant shall pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- as costs to the Tamil Nadu Legal Services Authority, Chennai, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon the deposit being made by the appellant within the time prescribed by this Court, the Trial Court is directed to restore the case in H.M.O.P.No.215 of 2019 and issue notice to the respondent. After the appearance of the respondent, the Trial Court shall dispose of the case on merits and in accordance with law after providing opportunities to all the parties, as expeditiously as possible.

6. With the above directions, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (M.D.I.,J.) (P.D.B.,J.) 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sp/arl

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

To The Family Court, Tiruvallur.

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

CMA No. 2350 of 2021

M.DHANDAPANI J. AND P.DHANABAL J. sp CMA No. 2350 of 2021 AND CMP NO. 13199 OF 2021 08-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 12/10/2026 08:02:09 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead