Madras High Court
CMA/4126/2019 of SANAM PARVATHY Vs RAJASEKARA REDDY on 8 October 2026
CMA No. 4126 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
CMA No. 4126 of 2019
and
CMP No.23332 of 2019
CNR: {HCMA010715142019}
1. Sanam Parvathy
W/o.Rajasekara Reddy.
2. Sanam Varada Ananda Kumar Reddy
2nd Petitioner Rep. By His Mother and
first Petitioner,
..Appellant(s)
Vs
Rajasekara Reddy
S/o.Raghuram Reddy, Inspector, 031070030,
C.I.S.F.Rtc Regional Training Centre,
Suraksh Complex, Thakolam, Arrakonam,
Vellore District.
..Respondent(s)
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act to set aside the order and decreetal order with regard to not granted litigations expenses and not granted the Educational Expenses from the filing of the original petition as prayed in I.A.No.174 of 2017 in HMOP.No.6 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvallur dated 12.10.2008.
CMA No. 4126 of 2019
For Appellant(s):
Mr.S. Prabhu
For Respondent(s):
Mr.R.Thiyagarajan
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Dhandapani J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed seeking to set aside the order and decreetal order with regard to not granted litigations expenses and not granted the Educational Expenses from the filing of the original petition as prayed in I.A.No.174 of 2017 in HMOP.No.6 of 2016 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvallur dated 12.10.2008.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, today, it is brought to the notice of this Court that as held by the Co-ordinate Bench in CMA No.1914 of 2021, only a Civil Revision Peititon will lie as against the order of interim maintenance and therefore the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is not maintainable.
3. In terms of the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in S.Menaka vs. K.SK. Nepolian Socraties(2024 MHC 1405), this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed by granting liberty to the appellant to file a Civil Revision Petition in accordance with law. The period during which the present proceedings were pending before this Court shall be excluded for
CMA No. 4126 of 2019
the purpose of limitation while filing the Civil Revision Petition. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
4. The Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the learned counsel for the appellant, under due acknowledgment. (M.D.I.,J.) (P.D.B.,J.) 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VSI-2
CMA No. 4126 of 2019
M.DHANDAPANI, J. AND P.DHANABAL, J. VSI-2 To :
1. The Judge, Family Court, Thiruvallur
2. The Section Officer, V.R. section, High Court, Madras – 104. CMA No. 4126 of 2019 and CMP No.23332 of 2019 08-10-2026