Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/22924/2026 of Boopathi@ Boopathiraj Vs The Inspector of POlice on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 08-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026

CNR:{HCMD011365812026}

1. Boopathi@ Boopathiraj

S/o.Duraisamy,

North Street,

Ayilapettai,

Koppuvadakku,

Trichy District.

2. Kodravan

S/o.Vanavaramban,

North Street,

Ayilapettai,

Koppuvadakku,

Trichy District.

3. Yuvaraj

S/o.Subramani,

No.5/70, Melatheru,

Koppukodiyalam,

Trichy.

4. Minor.Lokeshwaran

S/o.Gopaldurai,

No.5/45C, Kuditheru,

Ayilapettai,

Koppuvadakku,

Trichy District.

Being a Minor Rep by its father

Gopaldurai,

S/o.Pitchai

..Petitioner(s)

Vs

CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026

1. State of Tamil Nadu,

Represented by the Inspector of Police

Jeeyapuram Police station,

Trichy.

Crime.No.225 of 2026.

2. Praveen

S/o.Ravi,

No.4/13, North Street,

Ayilapettai,

Kopuvadakku,

Trichy District.

..Respondent(s)

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records in FIR in Crime No.225 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed

For Respondent(s):

Mr.B.Arun (R1)

Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

Mr.K.Yasar Arafath (R2)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The present petition has been filed by A1 to A4 in Crime No.225 of 2026, on the file of the first respondent police seeking to quash the FIR, wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2) and 351(3) of BNS.

2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026

3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and he acknowledges the fact that he had agreed for quashing of the F.I.R.

4. Considering the above said facts, F.I.R in Crime No.225 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PS To

1. The Inspector of Police Jeeyapuram Police station, Trichy.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. ps CRL OP(MD) No. 22924 of 2026 08-10-2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead