Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23024/2026 of Rakku Vs The State of Tamilnadu, rep on 8 October 2026
CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026
CNR:{HCMD011431712026}
1. Rakku
W/o.Palanisamy,
1/9, Ahathakulam
Narikudi,
Tiruchuli Taluk,
Virudhunagar District - 626607
2. Palani Kumar
S/o.Narayanan,
3/113, North Street,
Nallatharai Pudhupatti,
Narikudi,
Tiruchuli Taluk,
Virudhunagar District -626607.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police O/o.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.
2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District, Crime No.200/2026
3. Vanithamari
W/o.Rama Moorthy,
Ahathakulam,
Tiruchuli Taluk,
Virudhunagar District.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNS to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.200 of 2026 dated 15.09.2026
on the file of the second respondent Police and quash the same.
For Petitioner(s):
A.Balaji
For Respondent(s):
Mr.B.Arun (R1 & R2)
Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
Mr.S.Viljoen Ajit (R3)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present petition has been filed by A1 and A3 in Crime No.200 of 2026, on the file of the second respondent police seeking to quash the FIR, wherein they are charged with the offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) and 49 of BNS and 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. Pending investigation, the parties have entered into a compromise wherein the defacto complainant had agreed for quashing of the FIR.
3. Today, the defacto complainant is present in-person and she acknowledges the fact that she had agreed for quashing of the F.I.R.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026
4. Considering the above said facts, F.I.R in Crime No.346 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent police is hereby quashed.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of the order. 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PS To
1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police O/o.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruchuli, Virudhunagar District.
2. The Inspector Of Police, Narikudi Police Station, Virudhunagar District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J. ps CRL OP(MD) No. 23024 of 2026 08-10-2026