Himachal Pradesh High Court
CWP/18313/2025 on 17 September 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.18313 of 2025
Date of Decision: 27.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Uma Devi & Ors.
……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. …....Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary & Mr. H.R. Sidhu, Advocates.
For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Before reply, if any, from the respondents could be received, learned counsel representing the petitioners, while inviting attention of this Court to judgment passed by Coordinate Bench this Court in CWP No.4830 of 2023 titled Inder Singh Thakur Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., states that issue raised in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Inder Singh Thakur (supra) and as such, petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners in light of aforesaid judgment in a time bound manner.
2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that he is not High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 20:13:11 :::CIS
2 averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners with regard to disposal of their representation.
3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-6) in light of Inder Singh Thakur (supra), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and pass speaking order thereafter. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
November 27, 2025
(Sandeep Sharma), (sunil)
Judge High Court of H.P. ::: Downloaded on - 28/10/2026 20:13:11 :::CIS