Madras High Court
CRP/6448/2026 of S.Balamurugan Vs E.Amutha Ilavarasi on 8 October 2026
CRP No. 6448 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08-10-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
CRP No. 6448 of 2026
CNR: {HCMA012273032026}
S.Balamurugan
S/o. Selvaraj,
Plot No.3, Sakthi Nagar Main Road,
Gorimedu,
Poonamallee,
Tiruvallur,
Tamil Nadu-600 056
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
E.Amutha Ilavarasi
D/o. Elango,
First Floor,
Anna Salai,
Near Rice Mill.
Opp to St.Marys School,
Devakottai-630 302
Sivagangai
..Respondent(s)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the docket order dated 28.07.2026 in HMOP.No.762 of 2025
on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee and consequently direct to take up the I.A.SR.No.5340/2026 on the file and allow the I.A for Substituted Service and thus render justice.
For Petitioner(s):
Ms.A.Arulmozhi
CRP No. 6448 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the docket order dated 28.07.2026 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee and for a direction to the Court below to take the Interlocutory Application on file, number the same and to order substituted service.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the materials available on record and this Court also carefully went through the order passed by the Court below.
3. The petitioner filed HMOP.No.762 of 2025 seeking for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty. The efforts were taken by the petitioner to serve notice on the respondent, but the notice that was sent to the respondent both through Court and privately were returned ‘Unserved’. Since the petitioner had sent the notices to the known address of the respondent and it was not able to be served on the respondent for more than a year, the petitioner filed an Interlocutory Application seeking for substituted service. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Court below, without ordering substituted service, has once again ordered for fresh notice both through Court and privately to the respondent. It is under these circumstances, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed before this Court.
CRP No. 6448 of 2026
4. In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner has attempted to serve notice on the respondent, both through Court and privately to the known address and it was returned with an endorsement ‘Addressee Absent’ on one occasion and ‘No Such Person’ found on the other occasion and hence, the petitioner filed Interlocutory Application for substituted service under Order V Rule 20 of C.P.C. The Court below, without considering the same, has once again mechanically ordered for fresh notice to the address to which already Court notice as well as private notice was sent and it was returned.
5. In view of the above, the Court below is directed to number I.A.SR.No.5340 of 2026 and order substituted service, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No Costs. 08-10-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SSR
CRP No. 6448 of 2026
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. SSR To The Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. CRP No. 6448 of 2026 08-10-2026