Madras High Court

CRP/6512/2026 of Pushpavalli Suresh babhu Vs Pearl Beach Plot Owners Welfare Association on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CRP No. 6512 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-10-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

CRP No. 6512 of 2026

CNR: {HCMA012356072026}

1. Mrs.Pushpavalli Suresh Babhu

2. Mr. R. Bharathkumar

3. Mr. M. Aravind

..Petitioners

Vs

1. Pearl Beach Plot Owners Welfare Association (Regn. No.122/2018)

Rep by its Secretary

No.120, Paramankeni Village, Cheyyur Taluk Chengalpattu District – 603 305.

2. Pearl Beach Promoters Private Limited Represented By Its Director, Mr, Mohamed Aslam, No.71/35, Armenian Street, 4th Floor, Parry's, Chennai – 600 001.

3. Mohamed Aslam Rafeeka,

4. Mohamed Idris

5. Aslam Abdul Hadhi

6. Faizal Ashraf Mohammad

7. M/s. Pearl Beach,

A Partnership Firm

Represented By its Managing Partner,

Dr. T. Ramesh

Having Office At No.32, 5th Trust Cross Street Mandavelipakkam, Chennai – 600 028.

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 08:00:54 pm )

CRP No. 6512 of 2026

8. Mr. G. Viswanathan

..Respondents

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 23.09.2026 passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in M.A. No.246 of 2026 in Appeal (SR) No.479 of 2026 and direct the Tribunal to number the Appeal (SR)

No.479 of 2026 and to hear and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within such time as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to fix.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan

Senior Advocate

For Mr.M.R.Ramasubramaniam Raja

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek leave of this Court to withdraw this revision petition with liberty to file an appeal, challenging the impugned order.

2. Leave is granted. This civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal. No costs.

3. Registry is directed to return the original impugned order to the learned counsel for the petitioners.

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 08:00:54 pm )

CRP No. 6512 of 2026

4. The petitioners are entitled to exclude the time taken by them in prosecuting the revision before this Court, from 28.09.2026 till the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 08-10-2026 kak To Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 08:00:54 pm )

CRP No. 6512 of 2026

S.SOUNTHAR, J. kak CRP No. 6512 of 2026 08-10-2026

( Uploaded on: 09/10/2026 08:00:54 pm )

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead